KELAYAKAN EKONOMI USAHATANI PORANG (Amorphophallus oncophyllus) DI KABUPATEN SINJAI

Sultan Sultan, Iskandar Hasan, Annas Boceng

Abstract


This study aims to: (1) describe the production process of porang farming in Pasir Putih Village, Sinjai Borong District, Sinjai Regency. (2) Analyzing the economic feasibility (income, R/C-Racio, BEP volume & BEP production value) of porang farming in Pasir Putih Village, Sinjai Borong District, Sinjai Regency. The choice of research location was determined intentionally (purposive sampling) with the consideration that the area is one of the centers of porang development in Sinjai Regency. Determination of the sample using the probability sampling method. Probability sampling was used for sampling farmers in three neighborhoods and the Slovin formula approach method was used to determine the number of respondents, namely 42 respondents. The results showed that: (1) the production process of porang farming in Pasir Putih Village, Sinjai Borong District, Sinjai Regency, namely land area, capital for the cost of seeds/seeds, pesticides and labor are also affected because the porang cultivation technique is still not optimal (not yet intensive). (2) The economic feasibility of porang farming in Pasir Putih Village, Sinjai Borong District, Sinjai Regency is known that the income of porang farming each respondent (0.78 Ha) is Rp. Rp. 26,134,822, - each hectare of Rp. Rp.34,313,535, - and the average total cost per respondent is Rp. 8,470,088,- or the total cost per hectare is Rp. 11.120,744. So that the income of porang farming per respondent each planting season is known to be Rp. 17,664,734 (for 6 months) or Rp. 2,944,122 /month. While the average income of porang each hectare each planting season is Rp. 23,192,791 (for 6 months) or Rp. 3,865,465/month. In porang farming, the R/C-Ratio value is 3.09. Based on the feasibility criteria of porang farming with the calculation of R/C-Ratio > 1, then porang farming is feasible to be developed. This means that for every porang farming expenditure of Rp. 1, the respondent will receive an income of Rp. 3.09. While the value of the break-even point (BEP) of production and price is smaller than the production and selling price of porang so that porang farming in Pasir Putih Village, Sinjai Borong District, Sinjai Regency is said to be profitable to cultivate

Keywords


Economic Feasibility; Farming; Porang

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afifah, E. Mudita O.N, Setiono. 2014. Peluang Budidaya Iles-Iles (Amorphophallus spp.) Sebagai Tanaman Sela di Perkebunan Karet. Warta Perkaretan. 33(1):35-46.

Agrofarm. 2020. Indonesia Ekspor Porang Meningkat Hingga 160 Persen. https://www.agrofarm.co.id/2020/08/26495. Diakses tanggal 11 Agustus 2020.

Aisah, B.N, Andy S, & Nur B. 2017. Identifikasi Morfologi dan Hubungan Kekerabatan Tanaman Porang (Amorphophallus muelleri Blume) di Kabupaten Nganjuk, Madiun, dan Bojonegoro. Jurnal Produksi Tanaman. 5(6):1035-1043.

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Direktorat Jendral Tanaman Pangan, Kementerian Pertanian. 2021. Potensi Ekspor Tinggi, Porang Mulai Berkembang Di Sulawesi Selatan.

Diakses pada tanggal Rabu, 01 Juli 2020 dari http://tanamanpangan.pertanian.go.id/index. php/berita/322.

Idris M. 2020. Mengenal Porang, Tanaman yang Bikin Banyak Petani Jadi Miliarder. Di unduh pada https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/02/05/130900126/ mengenal-porang-tanaman-yang-bikin-banyak-petani jadi-miliarder.

Prihtanti, T.M. (2014). Analisis Resiko Berbagai Luas Pengusahaan Lahan pada Usahatani Padi Organik dan Konvensional. AGRIC Vol.26, No. 1 & 2, Juli - Desember 2014: 29 – 36.

Rudi Nur Hidayah, 2016. Budidaya Tanaman Porang Secara Intensif. Diunduh pada https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303881719. Diakses tanggal 10 Juni 2016.

Sabar Sutia dan Briman Tambunan, 2010. Analisa Break Even. Mitra Wacana Media, Jakarta.

Sari R., & Suhartati. 2015. Tumbuhan Porang: Prospek Budidaya Sebagai Salah Satu Sistem Agroforestry. Info Teknis EBONI Vol. 12 No. 2, Desember 2015 : 97 – 110.

Soekartawi, 1995. Analisis Usahatani. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta

Soekartawi. 2006, Analisis Usahatani. Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta.

Subagyo, Ahmad. (2007). Studi Kelayakan Teori dan Aplikasi, Jakarta: PT. Elexmedia Komputindo.

Sudaryanto, Dkk. 2002. Pendekatan Pembangunan dan Kebijaksanaan Pembangunan Agribisnis (Rangkuman). Analisis kebijakan: Pendekatan Pembangunan dan Kebijaksanaan Pembangunan Agribisnis. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor.

Suharyanto, J.H.Mulyo, D.H.Darwanto, dan S. Widodo, 2013. Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (PTT) Padi Sawah di Provinsi Bali. Jurnal SEPA. 9 (2) : 219 – 230.

Sumarwoto. (2012). Agroforestry Porang Masa depan Hutan Jawa: Budidaya Iles-iles Kuning Untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat.

Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.

Suratiyah. 2011. Ilmu Usahatani. Jakarta : Penebar Swadaya.

Umar, Husein. 2004. Metode Riset Ilmu Administrasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/agrotek.v6i2.237

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Sultan Sultan, Iskandar Hasan, Annas Boceng

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

___________________________________________________________
AGROTEK: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pertanian
ISSN 2581-3021
Published by Program Studi Agroteknologi Fakultas Ilmu Pertanian UMI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0